Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:18:19 -1000
From:      Robert Marella <marella@hawaii.rr.com>
To:        Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Question about FreeBSD 5.3
Message-ID:  <20041222141819.2fc5e93e@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <41C7F33B.7000509@infracaninophile.co.uk>
References:  <3B5700417F70BA4CA7D2EA98375EF64003157033@CAUUNI2K000MSG.unibanco> <41C7F33B.7000509@infracaninophile.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 09:56:11 +0000
Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote:

>     5.3-STABLE is a moving target from the RELENG_4 development branch. 
>   It should run stably and it can be used usefully as a desktop system 
> or whatever, but tracking -STABLE is not recommended for *absolutely has 
> to be up 24x7* type applications, because new functionality and support 
> for new hardware will be introduced, which can result in problems 
> occasionally.  (In practice this very rarely happens: which is a great 
> tribute to the degree of care taken by FreeBSD developers).

If one is *tracking* 5.3-STABLE on a non-critical system and is subscribed 
to the stable mailing list, how does one know when to cvsup and build world? 
I have not seen anything on the list to indicate I should update my source.

I have seen that 5.3-RELEASE is now P2 but nothing about STABLE. Should I 
be doing it regularly (weekly, daily)? Or did I just miss something?

Thank you for this and all of your previous posts. I look forward to 
seeing your name as a poster for I know it will be another learning 
experience.

Robert



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041222141819.2fc5e93e>