Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 03:29:35 +0100 From: Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freetype 2.1.9, Mozilla and Firefox [was Re: mozilla app patches] Message-ID: <200503040329.35605.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> In-Reply-To: <4227A132.40704@marcuscom.com> References: <200502282003.35926.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <200503040041.07369.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <4227A132.40704@marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 04 of March 2005 00:43, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > Dejan Lesjak wrote: > | Would you rather have this as a followup to ports/68747 or a separate PR > | superceding 68747? > > Separate PR. ports/78385 > | Should revisions of mozilla and firefox be bumped? > > Only is the ABI has changed (and it sounds like it hasn't). If Mozilla > and Firefox will continue to operate just fine with the new freetype2, > then PORTREVISIONs don't need to be bumped. I have here Freetype 2.1.9. I've grabbed Mozilla package from Marcuscom and Firefox package from ftp.freebsd.org and they run fine. Therefore I didn't bump revisions in patch. > > | Oh and in case you don't like names of patches do tell :) - namely > > this adds > > | extra-patch2-nsSVGLibartGlyphMetricsFT.cpp > | and > | patch-bugzilla149334 > | (it is attachment number of bugzilla entry #234035). > > No, the names sound fine, and tell us that these patches can go away > when the bug is integrated. I hope that what I wrote in PR about this makes sense (namely these patches were not integrated in development CVS of Mozilla - different approach has been taken as explained in bugzilla - unfortunately this doesn't help stable versions, mozilla-devel port on the other hand compiles fine with new Freetype without modifications). Dejan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503040329.35605.dejan.lesjak>