Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 13:42:58 +0200 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Cc: Cristian KLEIN <cristi@net.utcluj.ro> Subject: Re: Multiple firewalls Message-ID: <200610251343.06622.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <453E9FC7.4000307@net.utcluj.ro> References: <453E9FC7.4000307@net.utcluj.ro>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1419475.X0jGzh6FRq Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 25 October 2006 01:20, Cristian KLEIN wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Please review the following article: > http://cristiklein.c7obs.net/public/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ >firewalls-multi.html "Note: At the time of this writing, using IPFW and PF is not recommended." Where do you get such information? I know of several successful=20 installations doing things like divert for L7 filtering in ipfw=20 and "normal" firewalling in pf. Also note, that in order to use ipfw's=20 ALTQ pf (eventhough one w/o a filtering ruleset) is required. > Here is the patch against the newest cvs-doc: > http://cristiklein.c7obs.net/public/doc/firewalls-multi.diff =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart1419475.X0jGzh6FRq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFP03KXyyEoT62BG0RAhUQAJ9uP5mX5El/WEthfs1dHUiZAsVacQCfQ3Se DrS23Z7Rxo6UeGI2XXP6v+g= =HvEA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1419475.X0jGzh6FRq--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200610251343.06622.max>