Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:16:26 -0800 From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> To: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" <ml@t-b-o-h.net> Cc: Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com>, FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: date/time trouble - PST came too early Message-ID: <20071107231626.6AB304500E@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:40:16 EST." <200711072240.lA7MeGpA010000@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==_Exmh_1194477386_83616P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > From: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" <ml@t-b-o-h.net> > Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 17:40:16 -0500 (EST) > > > > From: Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com> > > > Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 15:09:35 -0500 > > > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > > > > > > > > > On Nov 5, 2007, at 8:58 PM, Chris H. wrote: > > > > > > > Ahh... I'm guessing that you missed the following post in this > > > > thread titled > > > > "date/time trouble - PST came too early [fixed]" posted 11-02. > > > > > > > > LI Xin offered the following solution, which solved my dilemma: > > > > > > No, I saw that... but like I said, most of us did this last year when > > > the new DST rules went into effect. Did you not notice it last year? > > > > OK. This is twice you've said it and you are wrong. This is the FIRST > > year of the new US DST dates. Last year DST ended on October as it has > > for many years. > > > > From H.R. 6, Energy Policy Act of 2005, SEC. 110. DAYLIGHT SAVINGS: > > "Effective Date- Subsection (a) shall take effect 1 year after the date > > of enactment of this Act or March 1, 2007, whichever is later." > > > I think what he meant to say is that we all fixed it last year, > even though it didn't go into effect until THIS year. I updated my > systems as soon as the "zoneinfo" port was updated. Actually, it was imported into RELENG_6 in Dec. 2005, but this is only relevant to those who have upgraded their systems since the change and I'm sure many did not. While the update is easy now, a few folks were still caught by surprise. In any case, since it was not in effect last year, it would be very unlikely that most FreeBSD users would have noticed it then. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 --==_Exmh_1194477386_83616P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 06/03/2002 iD8DBQFHMkdKkn3rs5h7N1ERAlpxAJ40bfFEsLyjtGAlF+439JAq83FpoACffYce UhqwacIvK3Dd1aDrWNfEDKo= =MIWR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1194477386_83616P--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071107231626.6AB304500E>