Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 08:51:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bz@FreeBSD.org> To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Paul <paul@gtcomm.net>, "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@freebsd.org>, Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Subject: Re: Route messages Message-ID: <20080701084933.W57089@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <4869EC1E.8060009@freebsd.org> References: <4852E23E.2040505@gtcomm.net> <4854EBF1.7020708@FreeBSD.org> <l68b649csbvpf6l1ud32atuhq80rr3gsvj@4ax.com> <200807010606.m6166jFe084204@lava.sentex.ca> <4869EC1E.8060009@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Andre Oppermann wrote: Hi, > Mike Tancsa wrote: >> I am thinking >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2008-April/090303.html >> is the commit ? If I revert to the prev version, the issue goes away. Ha, I finally know why I ended up on Cc: of a thread I had no idea about. Someone could have told me instead of blindly adding me;-) > Yes, this change doesn't look right. It should only do the route > lookup in ip_input.c when there was an EMSGSIZE error returned by > ip_output(). The rtalloc_ign() call causes the message to be sent > because it always sets report to one. The default message is RTM_MISS. > > I'll try to prep an updated patch which doesn't have these issues later > today. Yeah my bad. Sorry. If you do that, do not do an extra route lookup if possible, correct the rtalloc call. Thanks. Bjoern -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Stop bit received. Insert coin for new game.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080701084933.W57089>