Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:18:28 -0700
From:      Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD and hardware??
Message-ID:  <20081121211828.GA9493@kokopelli.hydra>
In-Reply-To: <1110372547-1227199990-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-585491769-@bxe064.bisx.produk.on.blackberry>
References:  <20081118141648.M84450@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <1110372547-1227199990-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-585491769-@bxe064.bisx.produk.on.blackberry>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 04:53:03PM +0000, twelcome@mobileemail.vodafonesa.c=
o.za wrote:
>=20
> (Forgive the top-posting)

Why?


>=20
> Your assertion that "linux is both low end unix and low end windows repla=
cement" is factually wrong: As a high end unix I think it's earned it's str=
ipes, currently dominating the top 500 supercomputer systems in the world, =
some no other unix has managed to accomplish this time round. Notably, when=
 compared to freebsd it offers support for virtualisation where bsd is nowh=
ere close to doing, just one example of high end unix feature it provides. =
As a gui desktop, I'm certain kde is a superior interface to windows in man=
y ways.
>=20

While I agree that, without some kind of supporting argument, the
statement that Linux systems are "low end" Unix replacements are kind of
spurious sounding, I don't think that market share is really an effective
metric for determination of the quality of a replacement for a given
class of OS.

I'm also not sure I see how virtualization makes or breaks the quality of
any Unix-like system, or qualifies it as "high end".

--=20
Chad Perrin [ content licensed PDL: http://pdl.apotheon.org ]
Zat was zen, dis is tao.  http://tao.apotheon.org

--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkknJaQACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKUaRQCgw43vS7XazE3sXHsbOdnjgq74
Y9wAoJG8VRwWTB7YmlnZIobHUN6nuyEW
=/BnO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081121211828.GA9493>