Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:05:09 -0500 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Kurt Jaeger <pi@opsec.eu> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> Subject: Re: security/hydra and www/hydra Message-ID: <20100721220509.GB23159@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20100721202111.GE4468@home.opsec.eu> References: <390621279717692@web26.yandex.ru> <86r5iwkciz.fsf@chateau.d.if> <4C472AB1.9070209@yandex.ru> <20100721202111.GE4468@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:21:11PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > And is this ok to have two ports with the same name. > > No, it's bad and should be avoided. I'm pretty sure some > portupgrade tool will break. No, they actually handle it ok. It _is_ confusing to the users, however (and, if you go through a raw list of package binaries, You Just Have To Know which one's which.) mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100721220509.GB23159>