Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:00:38 +0100 From: Oliver Lehmann <lehmann@ans-netz.de> To: Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsnap - overwrite local changes Message-ID: <20130122140038.Horde.8nr2dFTy5nEGcYtN8VWTjA6@avocado.salatschuessel.net> In-Reply-To: <50FE859B.7010607@madpilot.net> References: <20130122131026.Horde.7qCMctAArqe-64q8vD2RTA1@avocado.salatschuessel.net> <50FE859B.7010607@madpilot.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> wrote: > If you use small modifications on a ingle system(or just a few) you > could track the ports tree with subversion, which will be happy to > keep and try to merge your local modifcations. You can also diff and > revert your modifications using it, which can be quite handy. > > Disvantage is you will sometime need to merge conflicts which could > require you to study subversion more than what you really want. Ok, subversion came also to my mind but I guess portsnap is faster then svn is. The thing with svn is, that I would always need to examine the logs if there where conflicts generated. I don't want to keep my local changes. I would like to have command which just gets me a 1:1 copy of the "current" ports tree and deletes or overwrites my local changes. There is nothing I want to get merged.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130122140038.Horde.8nr2dFTy5nEGcYtN8VWTjA6>