Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 19:35:15 -0700 From: Oleksandr Tymoshenko <gonzo@bluezbox.com> To: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> Cc: bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net>, freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: upgrading arm6hf Message-ID: <20160521023515.GA15151@bluezbox.com> In-Reply-To: <1463797063.1180.354.camel@freebsd.org> References: <20160519232102.GF1049@www.zefox.net> <20160520021633.GG1049@www.zefox.net> <CANCZdfrRwnHvo1AyQxYrRQjyp9MWuNXYfX3HWub4Dc0Z%2BJ%2BFDg@mail.gmail.com> <20160520065945.GH1049@www.zefox.net> <1463776364.1180.340.camel@freebsd.org> <20160520231622.GI1049@www.zefox.net> <20160521002859.GJ1049@www.zefox.net> <1463795214.1180.351.camel@freebsd.org> <20160521021227.GK1049@www.zefox.net> <1463797063.1180.354.camel@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ian Lepore (ian@freebsd.org) wrote: > On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 19:12 -0700, bob prohaska wrote: > > Hi Ian, > > > > It looks as if three kernels are available. The one called > > kernel.spare reports > > root@www:~ # uname -a > > FreeBSD www.zefox.com 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #71 r297769: > > Sat Apr 9 18:11:07 PDT 2016 bob@www.zefox.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/s > > ys/RPI2 arm > > > > kernel.old reports > > root@www:~ # uname -a > > FreeBSD www.zefox.com 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #101 > > r300255M: Thu May 19 23:26:52 PDT 2016 root@www.zefox.com:/usr/ob > > j/usr/src/sys/RPI2 arm > > > > kernel (the latest one) reports > > root@www:~ # uname -a > > FreeBSD www.zefox.com 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r300334M: > > Fri May 20 15:47:30 PDT 2016 root@www.zefox.com:/usr/obj/arm.armv > > 6hf/usr/src/sys/RPI2 arm > > > > Would it help to back down to one of the older kernels, given that > > userland is closer to > > the latest kernel? > > > > Thank you! > > > > bob prohaska > > > > It might be worth trying to use kernel.old, verify that uname -p says > armv6hf again when booted from it, then see if you can buildworld and > buildkernel with TARGET_ARCH=armv6. If so, then you should be able to > install those (remember to use the TARGET_ARCH=armv6 when installing > too!), and then you'll be on the new armv6 with hardfloat. I think. I don't think you need to use old kernel. You can fake all uname parameters using env variables. e.g.: env UNAME_m=foo UNAME_p=bar uname -m -p If buildworld/buildkernel relies on uname that should be enough
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160521023515.GA15151>