Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:45:16 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu> To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: idea bouncing: using cvs as a replacement for mergemaster Message-ID: <2072C94B-26F4-4ABA-8E09-A409006F052A@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <474CE455.6070603@gmail.com> References: <474CE455.6070603@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 27, 2007, at 7:45 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I was thinking seeing the fact that I already have a cvs repo of > - -current does it make sense to just use CVS to update /etc > instead of > mergemaster... if so any ideas on doing it cleanly? > > - -- > Aryeh M. Friedman > Developer, not business, friendly > http://www.flosoft-systems.com > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFHTORVJ9+1V27SttsRAqcuAJ4sW4ObPrnUi6az4T+NQebCVMbDCQCfUS+i > gCRv9mwC2mu6B4LAPZ9bW3s= > =tD/k > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- CVS sucks and I wouldn't wish that requirement on anyone for their base system.. There isn't a decent idiot-proof / foolproof system out there for defeating merging issues... -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2072C94B-26F4-4ABA-8E09-A409006F052A>