Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:53:10 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?G=E1bor_K=F6vesd=E1n?= <gabor@kovesdan.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SoC 2009: BSD-licensed libiconv in base system Message-ID: <24e9a86bf5995ba551db8f27aa204191.squirrel@webmail.kovesdan.org> In-Reply-To: <20090428122225.GA2862@britannica.bec.de> References: <aa9f273a8313c6436e76fa9f5d587ef4.squirrel@webmail.kovesdan.org> <20090427183836.GA10793@zim.MIT.EDU> <49F5FE45.2090101@freebsd.org> <20090427193326.GA7654@britannica.bec.de> <20090427194904.GA11137@zim.MIT.EDU> <49F6C7A1.6070708@FreeBSD.org> <20090428122225.GA2862@britannica.bec.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> It's possible that there are little poor countries with an own writing >> system but probably their writing system is unsupported because the >> starvation, poorness and lack of water and electricity are more serious >> problems there. > > I wouldn't call all both parts of Korea little poor countries and it is > a wonderful example for why UCS 4 Level 1 can be problematic. > I didn't know about Korea. Then I insist even more on that Unicode should be extended to cover them instead of making implementation-specific solutions. -- Gábor Kövesdán
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?24e9a86bf5995ba551db8f27aa204191.squirrel>