Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:46:15 -0500
From:      Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com>
To:        freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   3 nics - 1 bridge - 2 ips - bad?
Message-ID:  <3B3A0DD7.87EDC7E@centtech.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Lets say I have 3 NIC's in a machine running FreeBSD 4.2.  
Is it possible to have this sort of configuration:
xl0 - 200.200.200.200 - [interface 1 of bridge0]
xl1 - NO IP           - [interface 2 of bridge0]
xl2 - 192.168.10.10   - not part of any bridge

the 200.200.200.200 number is of course made up, but signifies an
interface on the unprotected net.  The 192.168.10.10 interface is also
made up, showing an interface on the protected internal net.  Now, the
xl1 interface is bridged to xl0, creating a port for passing thru to the
unprotected net that xl0 is on.  Is there any inherent security flaws in
this configuration (besides having a possible computer plug into the xl1
port and not being behind a firewall), assuming it works at all? 

Thanks in advance..

Eric



-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Anderson	 anderson@centtech.com    Centaur Technology    (512)
418-5792
For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and
wrong.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B3A0DD7.87EDC7E>