Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2003 16:11:12 +0200 From: Jens Rehsack <rehsack@liwing.de> To: Mike Makonnen <mtm@identd.net> Cc: FreeBSD-Current List <current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] jail NG schript patch for mounting devfs and procfs automatically Message-ID: <3F2D1800.5020006@liwing.de> In-Reply-To: <20030801232918.GA37095@kokeb.ambesa.net> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030729124628.75304H-100000@fledge.watson.org> <3F26AA16.5030007@liwing.de> <20030729172122.GA5005@kokeb.ambesa.net> <3F26BC7B.8070507@liwing.de> <20030801232918.GA37095@kokeb.ambesa.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02.08.2003 01:29, Mike Makonnen wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:27:07PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: >> On 29.07.2003 19:21, Mike Makonnen wrote: >> >> >On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:08:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: >> >Yeah, I'll take care of this. I had asked scott to mail me his final >> >patch so I could commit it, but I never heard back from him. I'll >> >dig out the revisions from my mail archives and combine the >> >two. >> >> You can mail me the patch first, so that I can test it before you >> commit it, if you want. > > Hi Jens, > > Can you apply the attached patches and let me know how it goes? > > Cheers. Hi Mike, hi Scot, the patch works for me very well. I've checked what's been done and had only small recommendations: - Wouldn't it be better to configure the devfs rules by /etc/devfs.conf or is it impossible? - Even it would be a good thing, if I could specify a ruleset for each jail, and fallback to devfs_ruleset_jail if no jail_example_devfs_ruleset is specified? Jens
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F2D1800.5020006>