Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:13:25 +0100 From: "varga.michal@gmail.com" <varga.michal@gmail.com> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@freebsd.org> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: marcuscom and www/epiphany-extensions Message-ID: <3f1fd1ea1002250713v29671732i57d89ad0f666d1b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4B867F67.50409@freebsd.org> References: <3f1fd1ea1002250318o582bbd5ua5a695e3af5e3cb9@mail.gmail.com> <4B867F67.50409@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@freebsd.org> wro= te: > On 2/25/10 6:18 AM, varga.michal@gmail.com wrote: >> Hello guys, >> >> it's been quite some months into the 2.29 development cycle, and there >> is still no www/epiphany-extensions on marcuscom to be seen. Is there >> something wrong that prevents it from being ported, or it's just an >> oversight / lack of manpower? (In that case, I could do it.) > > As far as I know, it's an oversight. =C2=A0I didn't notice an update. =C2= =A0kwm, > avl, or ahze may have tried to build it, and ran into problems, but I > was not made aware. =C2=A0If you want to do the port, that would be great= . > Well, while generating temporary plist, I noticed that epiphany-extensions actually doesn't honor PREFIX, probably because of this line in configure: EPIPHANY_EXTENSIONS_DIR=3D"$($PKG_CONFIG --variable=3Dextensionsdir epiphany-$_epiphany_api_version)" ..which obviously points to: > pkg-config --variable=3Dextensionsdir epiphany-2.29 /usr/local/lib/epiphany/2.29/extensions ..where libraries get installed, no matter of PREFIX. Also from the quick glance it seems to me that the same issue is present in the current 2.28.x port, which strikes me odd as I was under impression that tinderbox runs tend to catch those. Anyway - what is the correct way to solve this, or possibly - am I missing something in the big picture? m.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3f1fd1ea1002250713v29671732i57d89ad0f666d1b>