Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 02 Dec 2007 13:09:14 -0500
From:      Chuck Robey <chuckr@chuckr.org>
To:        gary.jennejohn@freenet.de
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: handling pdfs?
Message-ID:  <4752F4CA.5050805@chuckr.org>
In-Reply-To: <20071128205045.66e28630@peedub.jennejohn.org>
References:  <474CD21D.5010002@chuckr.org> <20071128175815.GA18822@kobe.laptop>	<20071128130518.b9c545ac.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <20071128205045.66e28630@peedub.jennejohn.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:05:18 -0500
> Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> wrote:
> 
>> In response to Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>:
>>
>>> On 2007-11-27 21:27, Chuck Robey <chuckr@chuckr.org> wrote:
>>>> I need to read about 4 tons of some really sparse pdf specs.  I also
>>>> have a rather inconvenient throwback: I feel hugely more at
>>>> home-reading  documents in paper.  What I'd kind of like to do would
>>>> be able to perform cut'n'paste among different pdfs, 5 pages here, 10
>>>> pages there, until I put together maybe 100-200 pages, and sit back
>>>> and read it. What I can't do is print just a few pages out of several
>>>> 800-plus page specs, and perform paper cut'n'pasting.
>>> If you find a way to 'save' only parts of a PDF document, i.e. pages
>>> 5-10, 17 and 25 in a separate file, then the ``pdfjam'' port includes
>>> a utility called ``pdfjoin'' :)
>> You could print the desired pages to .ps files, use ps2pdf to convert
>> them and then pdfjam to combine them.
>>
>> It's enough of a roundabout that I don't know if it's worth it or not.
>>
> 
> xpdf allows printing of page ranges. I use it all the time.
> 

I'm not sure why, maybe I have too poor a font selection here, but the 
fonts, I mean, the onscreen fonts that xpdf seems to choose, always 
seems to run characters together, so it gets hard to read them.  So, 
xpdf wouldn't be my first choice.  I use kpdf to view pdfs for that 
particular reason, and onthe same document, kpdf does a distinctly 
better job,  If kpdf uses xpdf's engine, then it must find some way to 
pick better fonts for itself, it actually does look better.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4752F4CA.5050805>