Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 16:06:23 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> To: "Steven G. Kargl" <kargl@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, linimon@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/123879: databases/db41 fails during configure Message-ID: <483C155F.2070603@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <200805271352.m4RDqUv3051187@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <200805271352.m4RDqUv3051187@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Steven G. Kargl schrieb: > Matthias Andree wrote: >> The patch is rejected, db41 is fine on all -STABLE and -RELEASE AFAICT. >> >> Insult as incentive? Won't work for me. >> You just forfeited any chance of my looking at your issue. >> > > Whatever. You already sent me two private emails that > state you have no intention of fixing the port. > > The bug report should remain open. A maintainer (and > I use this term very loosely), who is too lazy to maintain > his port, is a poor excuse for suspending a bug report. Open Source communities don't work the "jump when I tell you" way. Send a patch, if it doesn't cause regressions on -STABLE, I'll approve of it. Shout out loud, stomp your feet on the ground, misattribute reasons, ignore workarounds - exhibit otherwise infantile behavior, all that doesn't change the situation. Why would I do people a favour and sacrifice my spare time who get insulting and don't try workarounds that have been suggested? Trying to force your head through a brick wall? Good luck, but I'm not interested. -- Matthias Andree
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?483C155F.2070603>