Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:22:33 -0700 From: "Support (Rudy)" <crapsh@monkeybrains.net> To: Ingo Flaschberger <if@xip.at> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "Wilkinson, Alex" <alex.wilkinson@dsto.defence.gov.au> Subject: Re: Freebsd IP Forwarding performance (question, and some info) [7-stable, current, em, smp] Message-ID: <486986D9.3000607@monkeybrains.net> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807010308320.19444@filebunker.xip.at> References: <4867420D.7090406@gtcomm.net> <200806301944.m5UJifJD081781@lava.sentex.ca> <20080701004346.GA3898@stlux503.dsto.defence.gov.au> <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807010257570.19444@filebunker.xip.at> <20080701010716.GF3898@stlux503.dsto.defence.gov.au> <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807010308320.19444@filebunker.xip.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ingo Flaschberger wrote: > usually interface polling is also chosen to prevent "lock-ups". > man polling I used polling in FreeBSD 5.x and it helped a bunch. I set up a new router with 7.0 and MSI was recommended to me. (I noticed no difference when moving from polling -> MSI, however, on 5.4 polling seemed to help a lot. What are people using in 7.0? polling or MSI? Rudy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?486986D9.3000607>