Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:35:52 -0700
From:      Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To:        Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [PATCH] acpidump: teach to disassemble arbitrary memory locations as AML code
Message-ID:  <4A32CA38.4020806@root.org>
In-Reply-To: <W6QSpRPwDx1bM%2BckKMKVCUsLU5A@XX1fo6zQUfC4h0jjRC6IBz3oNH4>
References:  <W6QSpRPwDx1bM%2BckKMKVCUsLU5A@XX1fo6zQUfC4h0jjRC6IBz3oNH4>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> It is not uncommon when some chunks of the AML code are loaded by DSDT
> from the memory locations that aren't part of the DSDT itself, but one
> wants to see what's inside.  It can be achieved with 'dd' and 'iasl',
> but it is better to implement this machinery inside acpidump to ease the
> life of both users and develepers that needs to see the full picture
> of the ACPI stuff from foreign machines.
> 
> This commit also have some small fixes:
> 
> - verbose output (going to stderr) isn't mixed with normal output
>   that goes to stdout -- the latter is made unbuffered;
> 
> - we're using IASL's logics to get the name of the output file and,
>   moreover, we prevent two simultaneous invocations of acpidump
>   to hose other's output;
> 
> - IASL exit code is checked and if disassembler exited abnormally
>   or was failed to do its job, the warning is produced to give
>   the reader an idea on what's going on.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru>

I appreciate your work. What we need to do though is remove acpidump(8)
from the system and import Intel's acpidmp utility. It's included in the
ACPI-CA distribution and is functional enough that we can use it.

Any functions we need that it doesn't yet have can be submitted to Intel
to merge.

Thanks,
-- 
Nate



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A32CA38.4020806>