Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:33:50 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Thomas Abthorpe <tabthorpe@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] New category proposal, i18n Message-ID: <4A4030FE.1020804@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200906221948.31366.tabthorpe@freebsd.org> References: <200906181114.43935.tabthorpe@freebsd.org> <4A3B3524.7090606@FreeBSD.org> <200906191020.25037.tabthorpe@freebsd.org> <200906221948.31366.tabthorpe@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
> To have localization, you need internationalization, so from this, I stand by
> my original proposal of i18n.
I have no objection to your reasoning, but continue to object to the
specific string. If you're going to go down this road then
"internationalization" would be the better choice.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A4030FE.1020804>