Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 May 2015 08:47:31 +0200
From:      horst leitenmueller <horst.leitenmueller@liwest.at>
To:        Scott Bennett <bennett@sdf.org>
Cc:        David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: persistent svn error message
Message-ID:  <8EED8AF7-875A-457E-AF61-9ACC22D71EB9@liwest.at>
In-Reply-To: <201505120602.t4C62qli023867@sdf.org>
References:  <201505111209.t4BC92Qb029366@sdf.org> <0EF0B2FD-7C3A-4077-9D97-1CA59F782724@liwest.at> <201505120602.t4C62qli023867@sdf.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi Scott,

you have solved it now ?=20

do you still geht the error if you do an update=20

cd /usr/ports/databases/
svn up

?

you can also make a=20

cd /usr/ports/databases/innotop
svn diff=20

(http://svnbook.red-bean.com/de/1.7/svn-book.html#svn.ref.svn.c.diff   )
which shows you the differences from your svn tree to the remote one

please is problem still exists, do a=20

cd /usr/ports/
svn info   =20

with this info i can check what happened with this node=20

br horst


did you have deleted=20
> On 12 May 2015, at 08:02, Scott Bennett <bennett@sdf.org> wrote:
>=20
> horst leitenmueller <horst.leitenmueller@liwest.at> wrote:
>=20
>> you can try to follow this posting
>>=20
>> =
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13376483/how-to-solve-svn-error-e155010=

>>=20
>> first:
>>=20
>> svn cleanup   (in /usr/ports/)
>>=20
>> if not helping you have to check WHY this node was not updated/ =
removed or whatever..
>>=20
>> hope info helps a little
>>=20
>     I took a look at that page.  Its example shows two error messages, =
the
> latter of which looks like the one I got.  But I didn't get any other =
error.
> Nevertheless, I did try the rest of the procedure, but it didn't make =
any
> difference (other than to download all the updates that had =
accumulated over
> the last several days that I had not been running "svn update" on =
/usr/ports.
>     However, the web site looked pretty cool, so I'm bookmarking it =
for the
> future. :-)
>     On Mon May 11 12:49:06 2015 David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> =
wrote:
>=20
>> I don't know what causes it, but if your /usr/ports is just an SVN
>> working copy, I suspect tha tthe easiest course of action would be to
>=20
>     It nearly is.
>=20
>> move it aside (by renaming it), then checking out a fresh new copy.
>>=20
>> (You could then move over anything that hadn't been created by SVN,
>> e.g., the former /usr/ports/distfiles and /usr/ports/packages, and =
blow
>=20
>     I recovered distfiles and local patches, but...oops...forgot =
packages.
> However, I did back up the old /usr/ports, which is where I recovered =
the
> distfiles from, so I can get packages back, too.  Thanks for the =
reminder!
>=20
>> away the old /usr/ports -- or keep it around to try to figure out =
what
>> was causing the issue.)
>>=20
>     Well, given that a new checkout got rid of the problem message, I =
can
> surmise that the problem was indeed on my system and not the server.  =
I'm
> unlikely to find the source of the problem, but the web page to which =
Horst
> directed me did have a comment added by a later poster that suggested =
that
> an interrupted svn run might have been the origin of the problem.  I =
don't
> like doing those checkouts because they take so long, which was why I =
was
> hoping to find a shorter method of correction.  Oh, well...on to the =
next
> problem on my list (but in a separate posting).
>     Thanks much to both of you for your replies.
>=20
>=20
>                                  Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
> **********************************************************************
> * Internet:   bennett at sdf.org   *xor*   bennett at freeshell.org  *
> *--------------------------------------------------------------------*
> * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good  *
> * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *
> * -- a standing army."                                               *
> *    -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790         *
> **********************************************************************




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8EED8AF7-875A-457E-AF61-9ACC22D71EB9>