Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:17:06 +0200 From: usleepless@gmail.com To: "Chris Maness" <chris@chrismaness.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DVD-Slideshow Message-ID: <c39ec84c0603290617n52d8fb32u80744bcaa365cffb@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <442A92B7.3000706@chrismaness.com> References: <442742AB.8070105@chrismaness.com> <c39ec84c0603271018t48797c2cgcba1c5662c807fc0@mail.gmail.com> <4428D51E.7080608@chrismaness.com> <c39ec84c0603280755h14955381l8e59568bea24376d@mail.gmail.com> <20060328095540.Q35270@ns1.internetinsite.com> <c39ec84c0603290012p57dea96fy3bb9bde0cfbbb0dc@mail.gmail.com> <c39ec84c0603290013s642f8ea4p256eedfc61428c86@mail.gmail.com> <442A9060.8050107@chrismaness.com> <c39ec84c0603290553y377e18f3jbefe6e26c21a1ac2@mail.gmail.com> <442A92B7.3000706@chrismaness.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I'm not doing this to benifit myself. I'm am trying to support the > project as a whole. Most of the things that you patched are already > addressed in _3. I don't understand why you would dry to work out bugs > in something that is not current. If we can fix the current tarball > then send in patches it benifits everyone. you mean me? not we. right? look, i had it running by patching the wrong wc-par. then i created some slideshows of my holiday pictures, burnt it to a DVD and sent it off to my 5-year-old-the-cutest-ever-cousin. there is no "most of the things". there is 1. when i fixed the wc-par, i sent an email to the port maintainer about the f= ix. now you want me to upgrade to a version which is apperently worse than mine ( i have no probs creating slideshow, i needed to add a symlink cause i tested your scenario ). i welcome your good intentions. we might send the port-maintainer an email stating that using 1.7.2_1 + wc-par fix + seq to job symlink works better than _3. regards, usleep
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c39ec84c0603290617n52d8fb32u80744bcaa365cffb>