Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 23:19:12 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed Message-ID: <eskpd1$sm4$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere><45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org> <20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere><008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <esk9vq$uhh$1@sea.gmane.org><001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <eskka8$adn$1@sea.gmane.org> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig389E99519B1B740FB9FB65C7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Artem Kuchin wrote: >> See here: >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-March/033494.ht= ml >=20 > Yes, that what i've got in the list and this how it was in the putty > terminal > originally. Nothing is missing. I don't know why open left parentesis > are there. The block under the header: " INDEX VALUES TEST BASELINE " is important - it summarises the results and your post is missing the summaries :) --------------enig389E99519B1B740FB9FB65C7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF7ejgldnAQVacBcgRAsV+AKDRwiEpvg88/KaxX/zTYyFM1DuutgCeNYrR fb89KqniFtYgYc5Q8/CawJU= =EW+P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig389E99519B1B740FB9FB65C7--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?eskpd1$sm4$1>