Date: 08 Dec 1997 20:48:36 +0100 From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan Smørgrav) To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: isa.c Message-ID: <xzpsos31uqz.fsf@hrotti.ifi.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Nate Williams's message of Mon, 8 Dec 1997 12:42:34 -0700 References: <xzpzpmblopf.fsf@gjallarhorn.ifi.uio.no> <199712081829.LAA12105@mt.sri.com> <xzpsos3lj3o.fsf@hrotti.ifi.uio.no> <199712081942.MAA12478@mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> writes: > > > > Is it safe to replace i386/isa.c in a 2.2.1R kernel with i386/isa.c > > > > from -current? > > > Almost certainly not, Why would you want to do that? > > Because the patches distributed with Luigi's pnp audio drivers won't > > work on a 2.2.1R isa.c. > You'd be much better off upgrading to 2.2.5R, as I suspect his patches > apply to that pretty cleanly. I have a list of good reasons for not upgrading to 2.2.2R, and a longer one for not upgrading to 2.2.5R. I also have a list of good reasons for upgrading, but it's shorter than the previous two lists. -- * Finrod (INTJ) * Unix weenie * dag-erli@ifi.uio.no * cellular +47-92835919 * RFC1123: "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send" # unzip ; strip ; touch ; finger ; mount ; fsck ; more ; yes ; umount ; sleep
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpsos31uqz.fsf>