Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 06 Jul 2008 10:15:12 +0900 (JST)
From:      Takahashi Yoshihiro <nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org>
To:        marcel@freebsd.org
Cc:        perforce@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: PERFORCE change 144729 for review
Message-ID:  <20080706.101512.193761302.nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <200807051805.m65I5T4Y056554@repoman.freebsd.org>
References:  <200807051805.m65I5T4Y056554@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <200807051805.m65I5T4Y056554@repoman.freebsd.org>
Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@freebsd.org> writes:

> @@ -67,9 +65,7 @@
>  	struct uart_class *class;
>  	unsigned int i, j, ivar;
>  
> -	class = &uart_ns8250_class;	/* currently ns8250 only */
> -	if (class == NULL)
> -		return (ENXIO);
> +	class = &uart_i8251_class;
>  
>  	/* Check the environment. */
>  	if (uart_getenv(devtype, di, class) == 0)

Please revert this change.  We want to use ns8250 class as default.
And the above comment in the diff was wrong...
The uart_i8251_class should be added to the uart_classes in uart_subr.c.

---
TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro <nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080706.101512.193761302.nyan>