Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 22:46:24 -0500 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster? Message-ID: <20171001034623.GB27224@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1ukz_gn3Ny4J52qoq0KjGmvDxLEZrBenXPA7o-YC%2BHSyg@mail.gmail.com> References: <81D84A650858BA40BF6936408052E6BC0138263988@msgdb11.utad.utoledo.edu> <k20i-pniy-wny@FreeBSD.org> <20170929182305.GE86601@home.opsec.eu> <20170929183448.GA175@gmail.com> <77334fc4-b64e-45ed-a443-4076e47acee3@BY2NAM03FT029.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com> <BN6PR2001MB173012B1DBBC7BB0A900DAA2807E0@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <COL004-MC4F55p68V8z000ac00b@COL004-MC4F55.hotmail.com> <BN6PR2001MB17309E4F64000C0C00DA086D807F0@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <CAN6yY1ukz_gn3Ny4J52qoq0KjGmvDxLEZrBenXPA7o-YC%2BHSyg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 10:06:17AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > as it makes FreeBSD unusable for those of us with only "small" > systems where the weight of poudriere simply can't be justified. I'm confused. I have been using poudriere for several years to build sparc64 packages. 2 * single core 1.5GHz CPU, 16GB RAM, 2 * 72GB SCSI-3 disks. Yes, it can get disk-bound, especially I am not using ZFS. No, it's not particularly fast. Yes, the machine is solely dedicated to this task. I do believe poudriere will struggle on the smaller ARM boards, solely due to the RAM limitations. I intend to do some further investigation. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171001034623.GB27224>