Date: Sun, 19 May 1996 02:15:59 -0500 (CDT) From: Tony Kimball <alk@Think.COM> To: palmer@freebsd.org Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMIT(System Maintenance Interface Tool) Message-ID: <199605190715.CAA07952@compound.Think.COM>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG> Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 19:48:51 +0100 Thomas David Rivers wrote in message ID <199605181339.JAA08152@lakes>: > Well - just to throw in that ever-dissenting opinion - but, > I have to manage several machines; one of which is AIX. All > of them are easy to handle, except for the AIX machine, because > of SMIT... A survey in the UK disagrees. It highlights the fact that a central management interface for the maintence and configuration of AIX makes AIX more cost effective to run than Windows NT server, and several other ``popular'' operating systems. I believe I posted the article on - -chat, if you want to look in the archive. I know AIX SMIT by word-of-mouth only, and that it is uniformly negative. Just a (very fuzzy) datapoint.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605190715.CAA07952>