Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 20 Jun 1999 04:44:53 -0500 (EST)
From:      Alfred Perlstein <bright@rush.net>
To:        Chuck Robey <chuckr@picnic.mat.net>
Cc:        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: laying down tags 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.990620044125.14320b-100000@cygnus.rush.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9906192347000.47432-100000@picnic.mat.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Chuck Robey wrote:

> On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> 
> > > I notice that in the last 6 months a change has occurred in how we use
> > > our cvs tools, in that there's a great increase in the usage of tags.
> > 
> > And that's a good thing.  Even though it adds some file bloat,
> > insufficient use of tags has made some painful events in the past more
> > painful than they had to be and it restricted other people from doing
> > certain types of experimental work.  We have been traditionally quite
> > tag-shy for the reasons you mention and it limits the full benefits of
> > CVS considerably to be so.
> > 
> > > I also notice that while I often want to see the last version of a
> > > particular port, I can not remember, ever, needing to see more than
> > > that.  The ports tree's profusion of 2-4 versions of the same piece of
> > 
> > That's why ports are rarely tagged.
> 
> I should not have brought up the thing about ports in that post,
> because while ports' bloat annoys me, it hasn't anything to do with
> tags, and probably just served to confuse.
> 
> > In short, I disagree completely with you on the question of tags.
> 
> Would you mind giving one example where not having tags hurt us?
> I just want to fix in my head the type of thing, because it seems to me
> that the same effect could have been gotten another (cheaper) way, and
> one example will probably set me straight.

Consider it preventative measures, several major overhauls of the
VM, NFS and FS have occurred, had one of these mega commits been
proven to be flawed in a major way it would have probably been
extremely annoying to deal with, no?

-Alfred



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.990620044125.14320b-100000>