Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 10:40:56 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> To: Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov> Cc: "freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org" <freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Is this list active? Message-ID: <20000818104056.A84928@lucifer.bart.nl> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0008061513160.14933-100000@mini.acl.lanl.gov>; from rminnich@lanl.gov on Sun, Aug 06, 2000 at 03:13:26PM -0600 References: <200008062041.QAA21285@sanson.reyes.somos.net> <Pine.LNX.4.20.0008061513160.14933-100000@mini.acl.lanl.gov>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-On [20000806 23:15], Ronald G Minnich (rminnich@lanl.gov) wrote: >it's not real active, though we wish it were ... *nod* The problem is that both Eivind Eklund and me got sidetracked with other things which caused, at least for me, some lack of time for clustering. However, I am still looking at this, but my experience on clustering doesn't in the distance even match Eivind's. Just a curious question, I guess a keep alive type of system where a daemon per host sends out and acks keep alive messages is the easiest form of high availability, right? -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> VIA Net.Works The Netherlands BSD: Technical excellence at its best http://www.via-net-works.nl Truth is always exciting. Speak it, then. Life is boring without it... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000818104056.A84928>