Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 06 Jan 2002 17:59:20 -0500
From:      Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>
To:        "Kaven, Oliver" <Oliver_Kaven@ziffdavis.com>
Cc:        cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us, cdillon@inter-linc.net, tlambert2@mindspring.com, advocacy@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Your freebsd-advocacy discussion
Message-ID:  <3C38D6C8.4050605@potentialtech.com>
References:  <B3F38D3937BA2646BBB30F0682E9F0270BF625@EDMSG007.media.ziffdavis.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thank you for the clarification.
I think, however, that you missed the point of my original post. That point
was that FreeBSD often tends to outperform Linux under similar conditions,
and I was curious to see if it would do so in the SMB arena.

-Bill

Kaven, Oliver wrote:
> Gentlemen:
> 
> I just recently stumbled across a discussion thread on freebsd-advocacy 
> relating to one of PC Magazine's past articles. I know that this thread 
> is fairly old, but would like to offer some insight into the testing 
> methodology if still needed.
> 
> Here are some answers to the basic questions in the thread:
> 
> Benchmark used: Netbench 7.0.2
> Client OS used : Win2K with most recent service pack at the time (SP2)
> Client RAM used: RAM was a mixture of 256 and 512 MB
> 
> I would like to stress that we did use Netbench as a performance 
> measurement tool. Netbench's number of clients does not relate to actual 
> users. One Netbench client generates traffic that corresponds to many 
> more clients in "real-life".
> 
> - - - - - - - - - -
> Concepts about NetBench's results
> Here's a summary of some of the NetBench concepts you may want to keep 
> in mind as you look at your results:
> 
>           * NetBench's standard test suites are stress tests.
>           * Because one NetBench client generally stresses the server as
>             much as MANY actual users do, you can run test suites with a
>             relatively small number of clients and still get an accurate
>             measure of your server's performance.
>           * To get a valid measure of your server's performance, make
>             sure you reach a knee in the NetBench results curve. The
>             knee indicates that throughput is no longer increasing. (You
>             can check the results curve by plotting the server's total
>             throughput against the number of active clients.)
> 
> Adding clients increases the total throughput ... up to a point. When 
> the overhead of managing the additional clients outweighs the advantage 
> of having more clients, throughput starts decreasing, causing a knee to 
> appear in the results curve. With NetBench you may see one of three 
> types of results curves:
> 
>           * A curve with a single knee that shows a very steep drop in
>             throughput as you add clients.
>           * A curve with a single knee that shows a gradual, sloping
>             drop in throughput as you add clients.
>           * A curve with a double knee. In this type of curve, the
>             throughput reaches its knee and then levels out for a while,
>             just as a plateau does, as you continue to add clients.
>             After you've added a certain number of clients, the
>             throughput drops off sharply. This type of curve often
>             indicates physical bottlenecks that affect the server's
>             performance.
> 
> - - - - - - - - - -
> 
> 
> I hope this helped a little and please, feel free to contact me directly 
> if you have any more questions. And yes, we do hope to include FreeBSD 
> into our testing in the future. Unfortunately , time restrictions often 
> force us to limit our testing to the platforms that relate most to our 
> readers environments and interests.
> 
>  
> Have a healthy and Happy New Year!
> 
> Oliver Kaven
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Oliver Kaven
> Project Leader, Network Infrastructure
> PC Magazine Labs
> 212-503-5283
> oliver_kaven@ziffdavis.com
> ----------
> PC Magazine
> 28 E 28th Street, 11th Floor
> New York, NY 10016-7930
> 212-503-5100
> ----------
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Bill Moran
Potential Technology
http://www.potentialtech.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C38D6C8.4050605>