Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 13:59:35 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: arch@freebsd.org Subject: moving GEOM around... Message-ID: <5238.1048510775@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
A number of people have suggested that the directory layout of GEOM sources should be changed. The main complaint seems to be that sys/geom contains both subdirectories (bde) and source files. I personally don't particularly care about that, and as a matter of fact wasn't even aware that was a rule, but if a significant number of people think this is wrong I'm willing to repo-copy things around and fix it, therefore this strawpoll: Option 1: No change Option 2: sys/ geom/ infra/ geom_io.c geom_event.c ... bsd/ geom_bsd.c mbr/ geom_mbr.c sunlabel/ geom_sunlabel.c gbde/ g_bde.c g_bde_crypt.c ... ... Option 3: sys/ geom/ infra/ geom_io.c geom_event.c ... class/ # contains methods implemented in a single # source file geom_bsd.c geom_mbr.c geom_sunlabel.c ... gbde/ # classes implemented in multiple source # files get a subdirectory of their own. Straw votes in private email please... I'll draw whatever concensus opinion I can from the emails I get, and then I'll send the proposal to cvs@ who may at that time shoot it down as unnecessary repo-bloat. Poul-Henning PS: I'm not inclined to entertain a long bikeshed on this issue, on the more general topic of source tree re-layout and the need for a democratic process for determing the location of all future files in our cvs repo. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5238.1048510775>