Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 14:49:14 +0930 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AltQ + ng_iface Message-ID: <200508291449.15427.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200507312253.29038.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <200507290834.10268.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <42EBD738.2010105@elischer.org> <200507312253.29038.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1258481.TuLH8vAGg2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 31 July 2005 22:53, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > The calling code must always have a reference on the node to ensure that > > it is not removed while it is running in it. This is sometimes > > done automatically. This is why there is an ng_callout facility to ensu= re > > that the locking andreferences are done automatically and correctly. > > OK, I'll look into that. I see ng_eiface uses ng_send_fn to defer processing until netgraph locking= =20 allows - should I use it? (I'll try it later but a definitive answer would be nice :) =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1258481.TuLH8vAGg2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDEprT5ZPcIHs/zowRAsMFAKCcnNxn1v9fo41iHHcGmBQCuNYKdQCgqnMr LojdjsJ3RuBXw9GVIizrzm4= =hpi1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1258481.TuLH8vAGg2--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200508291449.15427.doconnor>