Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 18 Dec 2005 18:23:11 +0100
From:      Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org, "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: Should etc/rc.d/ike move to ports?
Message-ID:  <1134926591.744.4.camel@cream.xbsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <43A37617.2030406@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <43A33C0E.9050100@FreeBSD.org> <20051217000418.GC851@zaphod.nitro.dk>	<43A35FA5.4050202@FreeBSD.org> <20051217031024.60912c94@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <43A36C4F.4010005@FreeBSD.org> <20051217034304.5ed69ef1@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <43A36F14.1050804@FreeBSD.org> <20051217040348.087f1248@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <43A37617.2030406@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-sRaF1mfhnYRQC1xjXagN
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 18:21 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
>=20
> > Yes, that's what I (wanted to) say. ("my" then =3D post-MFC, post-fix_p=
orts).
> > Pav's PR will get us support for this in bsd.port.mk, the rest is
> > fixing the ports to be rc.d compatible and repo-copies.
>=20
> That's great, although ironically I _just_ ran into a situation where tha=
t=20
> is not the ideal way to do it. :)  I am working on updating misc/compat5x=
 to=20
> use an rc.d-style script, and tried doing it the way that you suggested,=20
> with compat5x.in. When bsd.port.mk tried to create the boot script howeve=
r,=20
> I got an error because work/compat5x already existed, it was the director=
y=20
> in work where the tarball unpacked itself. Most of the time this is not=20
> going to be a problem, as the source directory will be versioned (like=20
> foopkg-1.2.3), but this is a corner case that should be kept in mind.
>=20
> For now I'm going to suggest using compat5x.sh for this particular case, =
it=20
> can be adjusted down the road if needed.

	FWIW, I like having .sh.in instead of .in because you=20
	immediately know that it's a startup script, and it's not that=20
	hard to remove a .sh suffix in shell.

--=20
Florent Thoumie
flz@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer

--=-sRaF1mfhnYRQC1xjXagN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBDpZr/MxEkbVFH3PQRAlNdAJ42zhDCjfQrDDm7DYjePbL9nqx/hACfX5he
SpdETdJ1/hjwysaNzsIiJnI=
=QiNz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-sRaF1mfhnYRQC1xjXagN--




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1134926591.744.4.camel>