Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 04:49:41 GMT From: Ben Kaduk <minimarmot@gmail.com> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: docs/129623: suser(9) claims that the interface is still exported, though deprecated Message-ID: <200812140449.mBE4nf2R087003@www.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <200812140450.mBE4o1R0078174@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 129623 >Category: docs >Synopsis: suser(9) claims that the interface is still exported, though deprecated >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-doc >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: doc-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sun Dec 14 04:50:00 UTC 2008 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Ben Kaduk >Release: 8-current >Organization: MIT SIPB >Environment: pleonasm# uname -a FreeBSD pleonasm.mit.edu 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #6: Fri Dec 12 18:37:53 UTC 2008 kaduk@pleonasm.mit.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PLEONASM i386 >Description: compare the contents of suser(9) and /usr/include/sys/priv.h ... the latter no longer has the definition of the function. It's not clear to me if the man page for suser(9) should just be removed, or retained as a pointer to priv_check(9). >How-To-Repeat: Try to compile a module that uses suser, and get "No such file or directory" when trying to load it. >Fix: Remove the suser(9) manpage? >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200812140449.mBE4nf2R087003>