Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 19:38:14 -0600 From: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: portmaster: print /usr/ports/UPDATING on update Message-ID: <2C5F262F-FB94-41DE-B89A-9E3B797DA5DF@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <AF2XlJwkyRabE7/XEpXHY2VDMLQ@QsmfhJNucgI88DfvPJdT1/nyboE> References: <4D15D275.6000308@gmail.com> <AF2XlJwkyRabE7/XEpXHY2VDMLQ@QsmfhJNucgI88DfvPJdT1/nyboE>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Dec 25, 2010, at 10:25 , Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > And, for sure, it will be good to enforce the AFFECTS line > to contain the full port origin (or shell glob of it). Just be prepared for infrastructural changes, for which working out a = specific AFFECTS line would take longer than the patch itself, to simply = say: AFFECTS: * -aDe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2C5F262F-FB94-41DE-B89A-9E3B797DA5DF>