Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 09:37:48 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias <sonic2000gr@gmail.com> To: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3.4 SetUID issues (correction) Message-ID: <4EDB234C.6020306@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGH67wTOq37nnGF99hmNh%2BMf=N3oUXrqmUYfSE6OSaCDO_nuDw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CA%2BQvbrLhdU9JcPo9W%2BDbUGVeqpmXHFCWd3b51kvLAL-Nh_gS7Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAGH67wTOq37nnGF99hmNh%2BMf=N3oUXrqmUYfSE6OSaCDO_nuDw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/12/2011 12:47 πμ, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Steve Craver<scraver@gsd-usa.com> wrote: >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/developers-handbook/secure-setuid.html >> >> There is an instance of *setuid* that is spelled *seteuid*. > Agreed. Just to make things clear: > > s/In particular, all seteuid application/In particular, all setuid application/ > > Thanks! > -Garrett Seteuid also appears on the <indexterm> of the section so it is probably not a coincidence. Seteuid is a valid term (set effective user id) and it might be what the original author actually meant, but I'm not sure.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EDB234C.6020306>