Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:35:16 -0700
From:      =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ask_Bj=F8rn_Hansen?= <ask@develooper.com>
To:        Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Problem with NanoBSD And Alix Board not device boot
Message-ID:  <B03DCB85-A9C1-4AF4-8D10-ABC390BD9B35@develooper.com>
In-Reply-To: <81D83998-D920-4A69-ACF8-519527D3BC7F@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <BANLkTikZx=uxokXcpQUi2jksgdMaUp4_%2BQ@mail.gmail.com> <E18BA1D4-C2A7-4FE7-A1A4-0C5B6FDD60DB@bsdimp.com> <81D83998-D920-4A69-ACF8-519527D3BC7F@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--Apple-Mail=_F41316D9-9EAF-4049-B943-82F91E01AB1F
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii


On Jun 5, 2011, at 10:10, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:

>> nopacket mode is the hardest of all modes to use.  Your CF's reported =
geometry *MUST* be encoded properly in the nano config file.  This isn't =
the geometry that the CF card reader reports, but what the CF card =
reports in true IDE mode.  This will vary from card to card (even cards =
with exactly the same label). Unless your boot loader doesn't support =
packet mode properly, I'd strongly urge you to use packet mode.
>=20
> Last time I checked, the TinyBIOS used in the Alix boards does not =
support packet mode properly (but according to =
http://blog.brixandersen.dk/?p=3D94 this was 3 years ago, I'll try to =
find time to retest against a newer version of TinyBIOS).

One of the 0.99x firmware updates fixed that I believe (sometime in 2007 =
or 2008).   (I use packet mode on Alix boards for what it's worth).


 - ask

--=20
http://develooper.com/ - http://askask.com/



--Apple-Mail=_F41316D9-9EAF-4049-B943-82F91E01AB1F--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B03DCB85-A9C1-4AF4-8D10-ABC390BD9B35>