Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 13:04:28 -0400 From: Ben Kaduk <minimarmot@gmail.com> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r220241 - in stable/8/sys: kern sys Message-ID: <CAK2BMK6OrJ52jMNi8oJeAEyBAHj0AFMFRdjhUaYPZsWka7A75g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201104011250.p31CoULd045353@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201104011250.p31CoULd045353@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[replying to -fs since that is where the original discussion of adding O_CLOEXEC occurred] On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Konstantin Belousov <kib@freebsd.org> wrote= : > Author: kib > Date: Fri Apr =A01 12:50:29 2011 > New Revision: 220241 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/220241 > > Log: > =A0MFC r219999: > =A0Add O_CLOEXEC flag to open(2) and fhopen(2). I saw mail go by on debian-bsd@lists.debian.org that the are going to pick up on these O_CLOEXEC definitions and export them, which included the comment: No O_SEARCH yet, since FreeBSD doesn't seem to implement it. Would there be any reason for us to support O_SEARCH? http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/open.html does not make it very clear to me whether we would want to.... -Ben Kaduk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAK2BMK6OrJ52jMNi8oJeAEyBAHj0AFMFRdjhUaYPZsWka7A75g>