Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 12:31:02 +0200 From: olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> Cc: apache@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: apache 2.2 ports Message-ID: <540C33E6.3040805@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <8DF8037F-F9EC-488D-86C4-0923789C174C@adamw.org> References: <8DF8037F-F9EC-488D-86C4-0923789C174C@adamw.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2014-09-06 17:24, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> apache team -
>
> So it seems that setting USE_APACHE=22 doesn’t actually depend on apache-2.2. This means that every USE_APACHE=22 port is broken, and as of right now won’t have any 10.1 packages.
>
> I’m happy to go through and add "DEFAULT_VERSIONS= APACHE=22” to this ports, but I wanted to check with you guys first. Is that the right way to fix it? Is there something else that can be done to make USE_APACHE=22 actually depend on apache-2.2?
>
> # Adam
>
Hi Adam,
could you give the patch below a try?
I've tested the patch with a small selection from USE_APACHE=(22|22+|24) ports and with the patch bsd.default-versions.mk does not overwrite the requirements.
// olli
Index: Mk/bsd.apache.mk
===================================================================
--- Mk/bsd.apache.mk (revision 367503)
+++ Mk/bsd.apache.mk (working copy)
@@ -288,8 +288,6 @@
. endif
.elif defined(APACHE_PORT)
_APACHE_VERSION!= ${ECHO_CMD} ${APACHE_PORT} | ${SED} -ne 's,.*/apache\([0-9]*\).*,\1,p'
-.else
-_APACHE_VERSION:= ${DEFAULT_APACHE_VERSION}
.endif
.if defined(USE_APACHE)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?540C33E6.3040805>