Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 03:21:22 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 213554] I am done with FreeBSD after 20+ years. Message-ID: <bug-213554-10@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213554 Bug ID: 213554 Summary: I am done with FreeBSD after 20+ years. Product: Services Version: unspecified Hardware: i386 OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Many People Priority: --- Component: Code Review Assignee: phabric-admin@FreeBSD.org Reporter: nibbana@gmx.us CC: freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.org CC: freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.org I know I am not alone, and having dealt with the already unfavorable situat= ion of using a small-minority UN*X system for 20+ years, thru often difficult times, I AM FINISHED. I used FreeBSD 1.x, 2.x, 4.x, 9.3, and after finding a need for a functional web-browser (which I don't really blame FreeBSD for - since it seems the en= tire web has become a massive corporatized/monopolized overly complex total-information-control POS), I tried the 11.x series, and have seen enou= gh of the changes in personal and their personalities to say "good-bye" for go= od. At first, I used FreeBSD because, at the time, I was developing embedded systems, with a background in Aeronautics and Chemistry, areas with a high degree of intelligence and precision, and FreeBSD development in the early = days seemed to have come with the assurance of a quality product made by people highly skilled and knowledgeable in the field of UN*X operating systems, an area which offered the only real hope to the average PC user in having a de= cent computer - it was either that, or a MacIntosh or MS Windows 3.1 and DOS, wh= ich were dismal alternatives. And I was very pleased with FreeBSD up to 4.11, but felt uncomfortable with various decisions and changes in personel after that, and stayed away until 9.3, when I finally decided to try to upgrade. But in that time, I interestingly met many old Apple II hackers from the early late 70s/early 8= 0s, some of which were harrassed by the DOJ/FBI and served time in federal pris= on for really silly things, nonsense, laughable things (computer/hacking relat= ed). But those were the days of fairly conservatively minded people with conservative principles founded in freedom-based reasoning and intelligent understandings of the nature of govt/corps and the world even so. Some of those same people now belong to various underground organizations because of the evil they have dealt with in exercising integrity in a world of TV-trai= ned and indoctrinated morons.=20 But now, it seems that FreeBSD has been taken over by the left-wing of the ultra-liberal wing, and it has become childish, full of trannies and queers= and a whole parade of assholes that really have no business in a serious enough organization where competant inviduals can provide a quality UN*X-like syst= em, so fuck it - good luck FreeBSD - as the country and world go, so will FreeB= SD go, even faster. You're really finished, despite being built on the many h= ours of arduous work of some of the greatest minds in the world. When you're le= d by decay and decadence, you rot and go to hell, and that's my prediction for t= he BSDs which have, apparently, been taken over by leftist and immature mentalities which place higher regards toward sexuality than the production= of quality and innovative code. 11.0-RELEASE wasn't even worthy of a RELEASE by any stretch of the imaginat= ion. It was a complete botch, not even alpha quality. Worse than anything Micro= soft ever provided to the public - which is a serious indictment, considering th= at FreeBSD has now shown that it is far worse than what it was designed to surpass, and originally did surpass. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-213554-10>