Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 12:40:38 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> To: "O. Hartmann" <ohartmann@walstatt.org> Cc: Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Mailing Lists <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Xeon Gold 6138's Running FBSD 11.1 and TrueOS Stable [GCC 5.4] Message-ID: <CAJ-VmompAkU%2BvLhHGfanJLszAJB8fNrG_PmmtjgiEiGciYGfCw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20171009120224.3f2ca1e6@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> References: <CAD2Ti28dJFMf16osgLT8%2BdayPJZDtuALncs5MUnoQGqvbFc2wQ@mail.gmail.com> <43eb65d2-ffed-8216-17f8-7936932e5e0a@freebsd.org> <20171009120224.3f2ca1e6@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sigh, It's likely more memory layout nonsense. It'd be nice to see their benchmarks run linux binaries on freebsd. The last time I dug into this I found it was 95% due to memory layout and 5% due to ULE being silly. -adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmompAkU%2BvLhHGfanJLszAJB8fNrG_PmmtjgiEiGciYGfCw>