Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 20:03:35 -0400 From: <starikarp@dismail.de> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Massive PORTS_REVISION bump after making gcc-9.1 default Message-ID: <20190727200335.5fa82409@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1sT1-gt6qW=9mWBbN02Kbsu=N5=Mt7qVexJSDo1d3C4rA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAN6yY1sT1-gt6qW=9mWBbN02Kbsu=N5=Mt7qVexJSDo1d3C4rA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 27 Jul 2019 16:26:51 -0700 Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> wrote: > Today I was hit with 226 ports needing update. With one exception, > all were the result of the bump or the default gcc version to 9.1. > The problem is that 9.1 was not installed first, so over 43 of these > ports were rebuilt with the exact same compiler it was built with > before the rebuild, eating up 2:45 of time on my build system. I'm > sure if was less for many as my build system is over 8 years old. It > was non-trivial in any case. >=20 > Should an install of gcc9 preceded all updates? Perhaps a note in > UPDATING? I certainly looked there before I started when I saw 226 > ports in the list. >=20 > Should I rebuild the ports that were rebuilt prior to the > installation of gcc-9.1? > -- > Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer > E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com > PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I had the same problem and some ports I rebuilt again. They should put something in /usr/ports/UPDATING. --=20 =E2=80=9CHungry man, reach for the book: it is a weapon.=E2=80=9D=20 =E2=80=95 Bertolt Brecht
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190727200335.5fa82409>