Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 10:08:14 -0800 (PST) From: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@bluemtn.net> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> Cc: Mark Murray <markm@FreeBSD.ORG>, <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/kerberos5/usr.bin Makefile src/kerberos5/usr.bin/k5su Makefile Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0103051006190.25971-100000@sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com> In-Reply-To: <20010305065158.C78960@spawn.nectar.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
BTW, is this still valid? From /etc/defaults/make.conf: # Kerberos 5 # If you want KerberosIV (KTH Heimdal), define this: # ** WARNING ** # ** WARNING ** This is very experimental at this stage. If you # ** WARNING ** need stable Kerberos5, rather use the port(s). # ** WARNING ** # #MAKE_KERBEROS5= yes Judging by the amount of work going into the krb5 stuff, I was wondering if this warning was valid or just something that didn't get pulled out. -gordon On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > Will we always have this dichotomy between kblah/k5blah utilities? It is > fairly annoying. Anecdotally, there don't seem to be many new Kerberos > IV installations, & Kerberos V's utilities can get/list/trash version 4 > & 5 tickets. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.31.0103051006190.25971-100000>