Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 09:45:26 -0700 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Replacing <utmp.h> with <utmpx.h> Message-ID: <B9E71A45-2FE2-4280-9B1C-E52F80D583BE@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <20100109120444.GW64905@hoeg.nl> References: <20100109120444.GW64905@hoeg.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jan 9, 2010, at 5:04 AM, Ed Schouten wrote: > Hi all, > > Some of you probably know that the last couple of weeks I've been > slowly > working on an implementation of <utmpx.h> for FreeBSD: > > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/utmpx.h.html > > This interface has the following differences when compared to our > existing `API' described in <utmp.h>: > > Does this have any implications for the compat4x/5x/6x/7x/8x libraries that we ship? Also, what legacy apps that are statically compiled and touch utmp/wtmp? Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B9E71A45-2FE2-4280-9B1C-E52F80D583BE>