Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 21:44:36 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 213768] editors/libreoffice: Fix build with lang/gcc5 on 11.0-RELEASE Message-ID: <bug-213768-25061-aB6lgwOJ2g@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-213768-25061@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-213768-25061@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213768 --- Comment #21 from Kenneth Salerno <kennethsalerno@yahoo.com> --- (In reply to Jung-uk Kim from comment #20) Ok, I could test with -include cstdio instead. It should already be included for every preprocess, that's one of the two major problems here with the gc= c5 port. The first problem is that the lang/gcc5 includes for C++ seem to be missing= a lot of things the system /usr/include/c++/v1 have, things that should be brought in as internal includes for named includes in the source, which is = why I need to explicitely include stdio/cstdio here. The second problem is g++5 expects C99 defined to enter the include bodies, which is addressed in the patch as well. If the supported compiler for x86 ports is clang, what's the harm in this p= atch as part of the if !clang? At worst it's redundant for other arches with a supported g++. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-213768-25061-aB6lgwOJ2g>