Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 12:02:37 -0700 From: "Crist J. Clark" <crist.clark@attbi.com> To: Mike Hoskins <mike@adept.org> Cc: Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: smmsp user Message-ID: <20020420120237.B76898@blossom.cjclark.org> In-Reply-To: <20020420031856.B13536-100000@snafu.adept.org>; from mike@adept.org on Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 03:22:59AM -0700 References: <20020420005050.F70074@blossom.cjclark.org> <20020420031856.B13536-100000@snafu.adept.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 03:22:59AM -0700, Mike Hoskins wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Crist J. Clark wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 10:28:02PM -0700, Mike Hoskins wrote:
> > Err... The '-a' flag for natd(8) has existed since revision 1.1.
>
> Did it only recently become mandatory if -interface isn't in use? Only
> after my last cvsup did natd refuse to run without adding "alias_address
> ${OIP}" to natd.conf... Previously, this had worked:
>
> log yes
> use_sockets yes
> same_ports yes
> unregistered_only yes
No. It's always been required to provided either an alias address or
interface since 1.1. None of the code has been touched for ages.
The only thing that springs to mind are some changes to etc/rc.network
(1.74.2.31) and etc/defaults/rc.conf (1.53.2.48) with respect to the
natd(8) startup at boot that I made in February. To my knowledge, it
didn't break anything. I was trying to fix something.
--
Crist J. Clark | cjclark@alum.mit.edu
| cjclark@jhu.edu
http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/ | cjc@freebsd.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020420120237.B76898>