Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:57:02 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: RFC: Big Makefile patch for WARNS settings Message-ID: <4AD2FD6E.8090208@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20091011170918.GU71731@hoeg.nl> References: <20091011145021.GG36937@acme.spoerlein.net> <20091011170918.GU71731@hoeg.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ed Schouten escribió: > Hi Ulrich, > > * Ulrich Spörlein <uqs@spoerlein.net> wrote: > >> Comments? Committers? >> > > Wouldn't it better to address the root of the problem while there? ;-) > What I noticed is that the patch sets WARNS?=0 for a lot of utilities, which actually have higher WARNS-compliance. Even if we don't "address the root of the problem" right now, it would be nice to elaborate and set each WARNS level at the higher value possible.For example, usr.bin/ul is marked as 0 by the patch but it seems to me it is WARNS=6 clean. I don't know the last sources, though, but I'm sure it will compile with at least WARNS=3. -- Gabor Kovesdan FreeBSD Volunteer EMAIL: gabor@FreeBSD.org .:|:. gabor@kovesdan.org WEB: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4AD2FD6E.8090208>