Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 1 Aug 2010 18:30:49 -0500
From:      David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net>
To:        "Jason C. Wells" <jcw@speakeasy.net>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Typical Network Performance
Message-ID:  <8627B125-F3BB-42B2-98CF-600E21A93A2D@hiwaay.net>
In-Reply-To: <4C55E4B5.7000201@speakeasy.net>
References:  <4C55E4B5.7000201@speakeasy.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Aug 1, 2010, at 4:18 PM, Jason C. Wells wrote:

> I have a 100 mbps (12,207 KiB/s) home LAN in full-duplex.  A 1 MiB =
file transfers at 146.7 KiB/s via wput.  The same file transfers at =
91.34 KiB/s via samba.  That's less than 1% of available transfer rate.  =
Seems like my transfers are slow.  I do better than that when installing =
via the internet.
>=20
> Does the FTP performance compared to available bandwidth seem right?  =
Is the relative performance of samba to FTP right?  I read a couple =
quick links on the net which said, "It's complicated."

Gigabit ethernet from a 2.8 GHz P4 to or from MacPro I am only limited =
by disk data rate. About 60 MB/sec on one end of the disk, more on the =
other end of the disk.=20

--
David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8627B125-F3BB-42B2-98CF-600E21A93A2D>