Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 17:15:52 -0700 From: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org> To: stewart@nameless-uk.com Cc: "'Gordon Tetlow'" <gordont@gnf.org>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, "'Greg Lehey'" <grog@lemis.com> Subject: Re: PANIC in FFS -- Please HELP! [resolved] Message-ID: <200107210015.f6L0Frd01224@mass.dis.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:58:35 BST." <008301c11102$8ec2ea70$0f01000a@saturn>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Does anybody know which, if any, optimisations actually work
> with _no_ ill effects? I guess the -march and -mcpu options are safe?
> Otherwise, why are they in -stable. But the others?
They're in -stable because they're part of the toolchain. Like 'rm -rf /'
they're not necessarily smart to *use*.
--
... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want
to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force
people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt]
V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200107210015.f6L0Frd01224>