Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 20:45:27 -0500 From: "Donald J . Maddox" <dmaddox@sc.rr.com> To: Coleman Kane <cokane@micro.ti.com>, "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG, Jacob Frelinger <jolly@gibbon.kungfumonkey.com> Subject: Re: problems with gl apps. Message-ID: <20010119204527.A962@cae88-102-101.sc.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <20010119033350.A3643@cae88-102-101.sc.rr.com>; from dmaddox@sc.rr.com on Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 03:33:50AM -0500 References: <20010119003117.A6702@cokane.yi.org> <XFMail.010119160418.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20010119034036.A7735@cokane.yi.org> <20010119033350.A3643@cae88-102-101.sc.rr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sorry, but I seem to have totally fabricated this in my feverish imagination :-/ I could swear that I had read on one of the lists that libc and libc_r were being unified, but I can find no reference whatsoever to it now. Sorry... Must rest now... ;) On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 03:33:50AM -0500, Donald J . Maddox wrote: > A lot more portable. libc_r no longer exists on -current. > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 03:40:36AM -0500, Coleman Kane wrote: > > Yeah, they do the same thing don't they? (I guess -pthread is > > technically more portable) > > > > Daniel O'Connor had the audacity to say: > > > > > > On 19-Jan-01 Coleman Kane wrote: > > > > Link them with -lc_r (libc_r.so). > > > > > > You mean add -pthread to the compile flags right? > > > > > > --- > > > Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer > > > for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au > > > "The nice thing about standards is that there > > > are so many of them to choose from." > > > -- Andrew Tanenbaum > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010119204527.A962>