Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 20 Feb 2006 08:45:40 -0300
From:      JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br>
To:        Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: kern/93422: Re: ipfw divert rule
Message-ID:  <200602200845.40948.joao@matik.com.br>
In-Reply-To: <200602200300.k1K30TZr050863@freefall.freebsd.org>
References:  <200602200300.k1K30TZr050863@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 20 February 2006 00:00, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
>
>  joao> ipfw add 1000 divert 8669 proto ip
>  joao> 01000 divert 8669 ip from any to any proto ip
>
>  The ipfw supports an IPv6 on 6.x and later.  It broke a syntax for a
>  tunnel.  So, this was changed to mean an IPv4 over IPv4 tunnel on
>  6.1-PRERELEASE and later.
>
>=20
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/ipfw/ipfw2.c.diff?r1=3D1.7=
9&r2
>=3D1.80
>

Hi
I am not sure if I understand what you mean  but the patch you pointed out =
is=20
not for releng_6 and the date is quiet old
but it is not clear for me what ip6/ip4 tunneling has to do with diverting

Jo=E3o








A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik  https://datacenter.matik.com.br



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200602200845.40948.joao>